
It seems I can’t hold a conversation with a journalist or head to a newspaper related conference, where the comparison of blogs versus content produced by newspapers, isn’t raised. Many publishers and those in the industry, feel that their news related content and editorial gives them a leg up on the other sources of news found online, due to a parvenu notion surrounding the quality of their content. The primary complaints about blogs, given by newspaper personnel, are that they are poorly written, filled with personal bias and created by people who are not knowledgeable and as a result, may not share all of the facts with readers. I tend to disagree with those that feel blogs are not a good source of news and information, as I can argue the very same things that bloggers are accused of ill producing, can be found in newspaper editorial.
Just last week I read up on a pending issue that arose from an editorial piece ran in the Hamilton Spectator. The editorial was about protests that represent concerns related to minorities and smaller (based on North American comparisons) religious groups. The journalist held the argument that police and law enforcement do not act accordingly to temper these types of protests, because they are conducted by minorities. The journalist also added that there was an overwhelming fear amongst law enforcement that acting would deem them racist in the eyes of the public. As the Spectator is a popular newspaper, read by approximately 260,000 people daily, the article was undoubtedly seen by a reader who took offense and reported their concerns to the Ontario Press Council. A year later, today, the Council stated that while they found the editorial piece “insensitive” the newspaper was not in violation. In this instance we see an individual, no doubt employed by the newspaper, injecting their personal thoughts into a news related piece and expressing their opinion and on a situation. This is no different from a blogger applying their thoughts on a news related topic. The jury is also still out on the level of knowledge this newspaper employed writer had on race relations, law enforcement and protest management, but their piece was yet still deemed good literature and published in a daily newspaper.
What many fail to realize is that many bloggers are actually industry experts in the area they blog about. They’ve either spent years working in a related vertical, have written several books or white papers, and or have publicly addressed large groups at conferences, all surrounding their related blog topics. I argue that based on their experience, there would be no one better suited to add commentary to news and information made public. I would go so far as to say that bloggers, in many ways, provide a service, as they add perspective to the news and information we are served and extend themselves to talk about the items we hold interest in, but depending on the political stance or nature, newspapers and newspaper sites, may not cover. According to Journalism.org, in the 47 weeks in 2009, where they studied blogs and newspaper written pieces, blogs and the mainstream press shared the top story just 13 times, proving that there is a need for bloggers and the content they contribute, to allow for broadened information consumption on the Web.
Blogs are not the enemy of newspapers, in obvious ways, they should instead be deemed a content source for publishers. After all, the ability to monetize the web comes to those who master the content game. We see a successful marriage here, as by no means are we discounting the level of content produced by newspaper journalists. I am aware of specific newspaper journalists who have amassed large followings, because of that quality. What we are saying is that no one should consider newspaper journalist content the be all and end all, instead the ideal mix for a publisher is to couple their content, with reputable blog content posted by active bloggers. This concept isn’t far off from the citizen journalist pattern many publishers have adopted, but what this will do is invest publisher interests with parties who bring a reputable audience and content they are not staffed to gather.
The issue of blogs versus newspaper written articles is wide spread and covers many industry channels. Take Dr. Jones, a medical professional, and his comments on the issue; “blogs like Science Based Medicine seem to offer the only guarantee of unedited rational thought on matters of health and medicine. Thank goodness, we’re no longer beholden to mainstream media for all our health news and commentary. It is a shame that most consumers get their news from TV and other outlets that don’t seem to maintain a journalistic quality filter”. To add perspective to the quote above, a newspaper asked Dr. Jones to provide a written introduction to a piece they were running on a specific medical procedure, but because of his written opinions, as strong as they may be, almost all of what he wrote was omitted and not published by the newspaper. I don’t know about you, but in the case of medicine, I would value the truth from a trained professional, versus the opinion of an untrained journalist on the topic.
Other interesting facts about blogs and bloggers:
- Total identified blogs, 126,861,574
- New blogs in last 24 hours of this post, 42,234, according to BlogPulse
- Blog posts indexed in last 24 hours, 918,400
- An estimated 77% of Internet users read blogs, according to Universal McCann
- 75% of bloggers have college degrees
- 40% have graduate degrees
more facts like this can be found here